4 research outputs found

    Spatiotemporal organisation of protein nanoclusters in adhesion complexes

    Get PDF
    The main goal of this thesis was to contribute to the understanding of the nanoscale lateral organisation of key proteins in adhesion complexes. For this, we exploited single molecule localisation-based super-resolution microscopy STORM to visualise the lateral organisation of five key proteins of the adhesion complex: the integrins, a5脽1 and av脽3, and three of their adaptor proteins: paxillin, talin, and vinculin. We first established that these proteins form nanoclusters of around 50nm size that are preserved across all five proteins. Interestingly, these nanoclusters have similar size and number of localisations regardless of their localisation on the membrane, i.e., in the different adhesion structures studied, namely, FA and fAs as well as outside, and were maintained for different cell seeding times, from 90 min to 24 h. These results suggest that nanoclustering constitutes a general mechanism of adhesion protein organisation, creating nanohubs of functional activity. When studying how protein organisation in nanoclusters changes as a function of adhesion time, we revealed a two- and a four-fold increase in the density of a5脽1 and av脽3 clusters, respectively, for cells that spread for 24 h as compared to those that spread for 90 min. Further analysis suggests that the increase in density of integrin nanoclusters is due to selective targeting of new integrin nanoclusters to the basal membrane. Following on from this, we then focus on mapping the distribution of these nanoclusters, first by measuring the nearest neighbour distance; (NND) between clusters of the same protein, and second by considering the shortest distance between clusters of different proteins. We found a clear physical segregation of nanoclusters of the same protein around ~55 nm, which is established at early time points after cell seeding for a5脽1 and the adaptors and maintained after 24 h. Interestingly, av脽3 nanoclusters exhibited a more random distribution at earlier seeding times and progressively reached similar lateral segregation at 24 h. Concomitant with this lateral segregation, we observed an enriched of all proteins at distances between 100-200 nm. Our observations are in line with the existence of a critical distance spacing between integrins needed for support adhesion and stabilisation of focal adhesions. Furthermore, we found that the relative distribution of nanoclusters of different proteins is predominantly random, with the exception of a5脽1 and paxillin, which organise with a separation of 50 nm. Such an unexpected random distribution between integrins and their adaptors might reflect the dynamic and short-live active state of integrins. Finally, we evaluated and described the mesoscale organisation of nanoclusters inside adhesions. Specifically, we computed the shortest distance between a nanocluster and the edge of the adhesion and studied how the distance to the edge depends on the NND between clusters of different proteins. Remarkably, we found a preference for a5脽1 nanoclusters to be at the edge of the adhesions and in close proximity to its adaptors in a peripheral belt region of the adhesions. Altogether, the results of this thesis demonstrate a clear lateral and hierarchical organisation of integrins and their adaptors inside focal adhesions. Based on our results (together with extensive literature in the field), we propose that one population of a5脽1 nanoclusters and their adaptors preferentially localise close to the edge of adhesion complexes regulating the process of adhesion. A second population of a5脽1 and most of the av脽3 nanoclusters organise more randomly at the centre of the adhesions, with dynamic and brief engagement to their adaptors, likely playing a role in mechanotransduction. As a whole, we postulate that the lateral nano- and meso-scale organisation of adhesion proteins is strictly related to and important for the functions of adhesion, mechanosensing and mechanotransduction.El objetivo de esta tesis ha sido contribuir a la comprensi贸n de la organizaci贸n lateral a nanoescala de prote铆nas clave en complejos de adhesi贸n. Para ello, usamos la microscop铆a de superresoluci贸n STORM, para visualizar con resoluci贸n espacial nanom茅trica la organizaci贸n lateral de cinco prote铆nas del complejo de adhesi贸n: dos integrinas, a5脽1 y av脽3, y las prote铆nas adaptadoras: paxilin, talin y vinculin. En primer lugar, establecimos que estas prote铆nas forman nanoagregados de ~50 nm tama帽o en las cinco prote铆nas. Curiosamente, su tama帽o y n煤mero de localizaciones son similares, independientemente de su localizaci贸n en la membrana, es decir, tanto en FA y fAs, as铆 como fuera de las adhesiones, manteni茅ndose constantes durante diferentes tiempos de siembra celular. Estos resultados sugieren que la nanoagregaci贸n constituye un mecanismo general de organizaci贸n de prote铆nas de adhesi贸n, constituyendo nanocentros de actividad funcional. Adem谩s, revelamos un aumento en la densidad de los agregados de a5脽1 y av脽3 en c茅lulas extendidas por 24 h en comparaci贸n con 90 min, mientras que la densidad de agregados de las prote铆nas adaptadoras se mantuvo constante. Esta disparidad en densidades indica que solo una fracci贸n de las integrinas interacciona con sus adaptadores, consistente con estados din谩micos de activaci贸n-desactivaci贸n de las integrinas. Tambi茅n nos enfocamos en mapear la distribuci贸n de estos nanoagregados, midiendo la distancia entre agregados m谩s corta entre grupos de la misma prote铆na, y luego, considerando la distancia m谩s corta entre grupos de diferentes prote铆nas. Encontramos una clara segregaci贸n f铆sica de agregados de la misma prote铆na alrededor de ~55 nm, que se establece temprano despu茅s de la siembra celular para a5脽1 y sus adaptadores, y se mantiene hasta 24 h. Curiosamente, los agregados de av脽3 exhibieron una distribuci贸n m谩s aleatoria en tiempos tempranos de siembra, alcanzando progresivamente una segregaci贸n lateral similar a 24 h. Acompa帽ada a esta segregaci贸n lateral, observamos un enriquecimiento de todas las prote铆nas a distancias entre 100驴200 nm. Nuestras observaciones son consistentes con la existencia de un espaciado de distancia cr铆tico entre las integrinas necesarias para apoyar la adhesi贸n y estabilizar las adhesiones focales. Adem谩s, encontramos que la distribuci贸n relativa de nanoagregados de diferentes prote铆nas es aleatoria, lo cual podr铆a reflejar el estado activo din谩mico y de corta duraci贸n de las integrinas, de modo que con nuestras condiciones de im谩genes, actualmente no podemos capturar la participaci贸n de aquellas integrinas activas dentro de la poblaci贸n total. Finalmente, evaluamos la organizaci贸n de mesoescala de nanoagregados en FAs, espec铆ficamente, en los bordes y el centro. Sorprendentemente, encontramos una preferencia por nanoagregados de a5脽1 en el borde de las FAs y cerca de sus adaptadores, en una regi贸n perif茅rica a los bordes. En conjunto, nuestros resultados demuestran una clara organizaci贸n lateral y jer谩rquica de las integrinas y sus adaptadores dentro de las adhesiones focales. Proponemos que una poblaci贸n de nanoagregados de a5脽1 y sus adaptadores se localizan preferentemente cerca del borde de los complejos de adhesi贸n para regular el proceso de adhesi贸n y probablemente interaccionando activamente con la maquinaria de la actomiosina. Una segunda poblaci贸n de a5脽1 y la mayor铆a de los nano-gregados de av脽3 se organizan de forma aleatoria en el centro de las FAs con una interacci贸n din谩mica y breve con sus adaptadores, posiblemente comprometidos con el proceso de mecanotransducci贸n. En conjunto, y similar a su organizaci贸n axial, postulamos que la organizaci贸n lateral a nano- y meso-escala dentro de las FAs es importante para las funciones de adhesi贸n, mecanosensibilidad y mecanotransducci贸n.Postprint (published version

    Shear forces induce ICAM-1 nanoclustering on endothelial cells that impact on T cell migration

    Get PDF
    The leukocyte specific 尾2-integrin LFA-1, and its ligand ICAM-1 expressed on endothelial cells (ECs), are involved in the arrest, adhesion and transendothelial migration of leukocytes. Although the role of mechanical forces on LFA-1 activation is wellestablished, the impact of forces on its major ligand ICAM-1, has received less attention. Using a parallel-plate flow-chamber combined with confocal and super-resolution microscopy, we show that prolonged shear-flow induces global translocation of ICAM-1 on ECs upstream of flow direction. Interestingly, shear-forces caused actin rearrangements and promoted actin-dependent ICAM-1 nanoclustering prior to LFA-1 engagement. T-cells adhered to mechanically pre-stimulated ECs or nanoclustered ICAM-1 substrates, developed a pro-migratory phenotype, migrated faster and exhibited shorter-lived interactions with ECs than when adhered to non-mechanically stimulated ECs, or to monomeric ICAM-1 substrates. Together, our results indicate that shearforces increase ICAM-1/LFA-1 bonds due to ICAM-1 nanoclustering, strengthening adhesion and allowing cells to exert higher traction forces required for faster migration. Our data also underscores the importance of mechanical forces regulating the nanoscale organization of membrane receptors and their contribution to cell adhesion regulation.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Shear forces induce ICAM-1 nanoclustering on endothelial cells that impact on T cell migration

    No full text
    The leukocyte specific 尾2-integrin LFA-1, and its ligand ICAM-1 expressed on endothelial cells (ECs), are involved in the arrest, adhesion and transendothelial migration of leukocytes. Although the role of mechanical forces on LFA-1 activation is wellestablished, the impact of forces on its major ligand ICAM-1, has received less attention. Using a parallel-plate flow-chamber combined with confocal and super-resolution microscopy, we show that prolonged shear-flow induces global translocation of ICAM-1 on ECs upstream of flow direction. Interestingly, shear-forces caused actin rearrangements and promoted actin-dependent ICAM-1 nanoclustering prior to LFA-1 engagement. T-cells adhered to mechanically pre-stimulated ECs or nanoclustered ICAM-1 substrates, developed a pro-migratory phenotype, migrated faster and exhibited shorter-lived interactions with ECs than when adhered to non-mechanically stimulated ECs, or to monomeric ICAM-1 substrates. Together, our results indicate that shearforces increase ICAM-1/LFA-1 bonds due to ICAM-1 nanoclustering, strengthening adhesion and allowing cells to exert higher traction forces required for faster migration. Our data also underscores the importance of mechanical forces regulating the nanoscale organization of membrane receptors and their contribution to cell adhesion regulation.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    A multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to establish standards of care for Angelman syndrome

    Get PDF
    Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurogenetic disorder present in approximately 1/12,000 individuals and characterized by developmental delay, cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, seizures, gastrointestinal concerns, and abnormal electroencephalographic background. AS is caused by absent expression of the paternally imprinted gene UBE3A in the central nervous system. Disparities in the management of AS are a major problem in preparing for precision therapies and occur even in patients with access to experts and recognized clinics. AS patients receive care based on collective provider experience due to limited evidence-based literature. We present a consensus statement and comprehensive literature review that proposes a standard of care practices for the management of AS at a critical time when therapeutics to alter the natural history of the disease are on the horizon. Methods: We compiled the key recognized clinical features of AS based on consensus from a team of specialists managing patients with AS. Working groups were established to address each focus area with committees comprised of providers who manage >5 individuals. Committees developed management guidelines for their area of expertise. These were compiled into a final document to provide a framework for standardizing management. Evidence from the medical literature was also comprehensively reviewed. Results: Areas covered by working groups in the consensus document include genetics, developmental medicine, psychology, general health concerns, neurology (including movement disorders), sleep, psychiatry, orthopedics, ophthalmology, communication, early intervention and therapies, and caregiver health. Working groups created frameworks, including flowcharts and tables, to help with quick access for providers. Data from the literature were incorporated to ensure providers had review of experiential versus evidence-based care guidelines. Conclusion: Standards of care in the management of AS are keys to ensure optimal care at a critical time when new disease-modifying therapies are emerging. This document is a framework for providers of all familiarity levels
    corecore